In the days to come we will be discussing all manner of things to defend America if you are one of those Americans who are ashamed to be American and feel we should be all the worlds friend even to the loss of AMERICAN pride,jobs,and freedoms you probally will feel unwelcome here cause we are loud and Proud.
AMERICANS bow to no one,not that we are unpolite but we are free AMERICANS and bowing is done by serfs to their masters.WE have no masters,only TO GOD,and ourselves ,and our country do we owe alligence. IF this sounds like you then follow along and join in.
What do you think? Right on or not?
11 years ago
I would first like to say Thank You to Chinasyndrome for setting up this blog !
ReplyDeleteI want to start this off with a theory on "RESISTANCE" that was sent to me anonymously by someone who is either brilliant or knows of someone who is brilliant. This will take up a few post spots for the first part. Here we go.
American opposition movements have always focused on the notion of organization. It has always been their goal to organize the people.
ReplyDeleteTheir hope has been to wield the collective power of the disaffected, downtrodden, and exploited as a single unit against the concentrated power of the ruling class. While their hope has been noble, their methods have been foolish.
Organized resistance has many drawbacks. These drawbacks have seldom been discussed by the opposition. I believe that the only effective resistance is a completely disorganized, decentralized, and leaderless opposition.
While, on the face of it, this claim may impress you as absurd. Of course it seems absurd! It is counter-intuitive. Never the less, it is the ONLY method of resistance that will work within American society.
I will explain why organized resistance has never worked in the United States. In addition, I will promulgate a new formula for effective resistance.
Why has organized resistance failed in the USA?There are many reasons for the failure of organized resistance. The two primary causes of failure are intimately connected to the culture of the United States and the political system laid down by our nation’s founding fathers.
**to be continued*
The Cultural Cause
ReplyDeleteAmericans, culturally, are anarchists. Few Americans realize this. Most Americans have a false understanding of the term “anarchism.” However, upon examining the beliefs of your average American, you will find that most Americans:
# do not trust leaders
# do not trust government
# wish to be left alone
# value their privacy
# think of themselves as independent from society
# do not believe that there is a systemic solution to their problems
# believe that others should be free to do what they choose, provided they do so in private and do not harm others
While it is undeniable that political culture in the United States often speaks to the opposite of the above list, it is also undeniable that most Americans register as neither Democrat or Republican and most Americans do not vote. Thus, despite the political culture, most Americans choose not to participate in it. This is not only due to their belief that the American political system is hopeless, but also is due to the cultural clash between the wider culture and the political culture.
Any attempt to organize large numbers of Americans into a single political movement will fail. Any attempt to create an organization led by a strong group of leaders will fail. Americans reject submersion into the collective. In a sense, Americans are anti-collectivists.
The Political Cause
ReplyDeleteAmerican political culture is not ideological. Politicians attempt to draw ideological distinctions between the two major parties, but these distinctions are a matter of splitting hairs. The only significant difference between the two political parties is the degree of compassion represented by the rhetoric of the two parties. Compassion is not a political concept. Compassion is an attitude. Thus, the two parties differ, primarily, in attitude and not ideology.
Despite this, there remain two political parties. One is prompted to ask “why?” If each party is basically the same, with respect to ideology, why do they not merge into one party? The answer to this question is best found in viewing each political party according to its true nature. American political parties are, for all intents and purposes, organized crime units. American political parties have more in common with the Mafia than they have with their counterparts in more democratic societies. Like Mafia, each political party competes for control of territory in order to maximize the benefit to their business constituency. Like Mafia, the political parties attempt to mold the system to maintain their positions and access to resources. Like Mafia, the political parties force the average citizen to pay “protection” under the threat of violence (taxes). Like Mafia each political party uses the “protection” money collected for its own advantage.
By defining our political system in terms of the “majority” and the “opposition,” our Constitution enshrines this two mafia system into law. Each Mafia passes laws to exclude new comers from the game while focusing the rest of its energy in destroying the other Mafia.
Thus, any resistance movement that chooses to become an organization is in competition with these Mafiosi. The deck is stacked and the power of the state, wielded by these organized crime units known as the Democratic and Republican parties, will waste the time and resources of any newcomer. A newcomer can only succeed by rejecting the political system, draining its resources, and undermining the rule of the state.
How is disorganized resistance superior?
ReplyDeleteIn some societies, dissidents become heroes. In American society dissidents are systematically slandered, libeled, harassed, and demonized. If they become successful, they are murdered (e.g. Martin Luther King, Malcolm X). In the American experience, movements that look to leaders are decapitated. Leaders are a liability, not an asset.
Organizations can be (and are) infiltrated. Organizations can be taxed. Organizations have legal responsibility. Organizations have membership lists and lists are wonderful tools for the oppressor. Organizations take on a life of their own. They struggle to exist and their continued existence takes priority over their mission. Organizations attract opportunists, power mongers, and attention seekers. Organizations tend to exploit their rank and file for the benefit of their inner circle. Disorganizations share none of these defects.
Bureaucracy cannot comprehend disorganization. Disorganization is invisible. The asymmetry of the relationship between organization and disorganization favors disorganization. Organization depends upon planning. Planning requires predictability. Disorganization cannot be predicted. This leaves organization at a disadvantage.
Organization requires a supply chain. Supply chains can be disrupted. Disorganization depends only upon the resources of its members. Supply chains that do not exist cannot be eliminated.
Disorganized movements rely upon swarming. Swarms are difficult to defend against. If you cut a swarm in half, you have two swarms. If you eliminate one of the resulting swarms, you still have a swarm. Disorganization breeds. Organization grows. The many and dispersed are a more difficult target than the large and concentrated.
ReplyDeleteOrganizations takes their steps by design. If the design is flawed, the organization fails. Disorganization relies not upon design but upon evolution. The motivating notions of disorganization are memes. Memes evolve and memes compete. This process improves the motivating notions of disorganization. This process produces multiple courses of action. While some may fail, others are likely to succeed. Taken as a whole, disorganization is more likely to succeed.
The important thing to remember is that it is easier to destroy than to create that which is designed. Thus, the cost to those who lose the manifestation of their design outweighs by leaps and bounds the cost it takes to destroy it. That which evolves is cheap and when an effort is created to destroy the evolved entity, it merely mutates and evolves again, adjusting to the new conditions. As a process that fosters evolution, a movement based on disorganization will continue to survive, evolve, and expand without cost. The resource constraints placed upon the designed (e.g. government and corporate) and those absent from the evolved (a decentralized and disorganized opposition movement), favor the later.
The limits of disorganization
I do not propose a complete absence of organization. Instead I propose a disorganization of units. Units can be as small as a single individual, or as complex as cell of individuals working together. Cells may be internally organized, but they should not be statically organized cell to cell. The movement should have no commander. It should have no central committee or governing body. No global plans should be made. The modus operandi of each unit should be to think globally and act locally. Ideas, strategies, and tactics should float freely and compete as memes within the medium of the collective conscious.
Conclusions
We need to construct a disorganized movement. You need not apply to join. In fact, it might be better if you did not contact me, or anyone except those with whom you wish to form a unit. Your ideas, strategies, tactics, and lessons learned should be spread anonymously or by word of mouth. When you act, should you decide to act in resistance, attribute your actions to “the Resistance.” The growing din of disorganized disruption will be felt as an earthquake. There will be trembles. There will be pre-shocks. The tension will mount and, in time, there will be an earthquake. When that earthquake strikes, the organized edifice of the oppressor will fall like a house of cards.
I chose this as an opening post because, it is important to understand the theology behind a successful resistance .
ReplyDeleteWe will have 1 shot at this folks , 1 and only 1 . If we get this wrong , we are phucked . Before blundering off into some patriotic war , we need to do some studying of the enemy we may be facing. If we storm off into this unprepared , uneducated about the possibilities we may face and head down ,horns up we will fail .
WE MUST NOT FAIL ! We have got to get this right the first time .
So, I ask you to read this , take it in and then we will need to discuss it . As china said , there are always several right answers so multiple questions lead to 1 solid , feasible conclusion.
SEMPER FI
III
Dude thats very interesting and I'm going to read it again,to make sure I didn't miss anything.
ReplyDeleteYeah that was one smart indivdiual.
ReplyDeleteThrow the bums out. Most people would consider that "overthrowing" the government. I reckon it is, because I ain't willing to wait 'till (s)election day. It needs to be done now, before it's too late...
ReplyDeleteThere are 2 more parts to this so, I will get to those tomorrow , 1 section at a time . This is terrific information and should bring up some very interesting questions . I felt that this would jump start this movement in the right way .
ReplyDeleteIn response to Mayberry : Mayberry, I think the world of you bro. I have been reading your blog for no less than 6 months and I continue to read it today . I understand and share your frustrations with the current situation and concur that it would be nice to "THROW THE BUMS OUT".
ReplyDeleteIf it were that easy , don't you think it would have been done by now ? None of us are willing to wait for the next (s)election day but, to coin a phrase "HASTE MAKES WASTE" . Patience bro , patience. Every dog has their day man, and these sh!tbirds will have theirs as well .
I fear that this is going to get ugly and before it is all over with, America will be looking at the world through very different goggles. Do you think that our oppressors are just going to roll over and let us walk in there and begin kicking bureaucrats in the ass ?
We have to work smarter not harder . The time has come, I concur but, I would prefer to have my brothers in arms educated and prepared rather then watch them be slaughtered due to them running into a shitstorm .
I don't know of your background, Mayberry, but the time will come and we will take it back through a patient, informed and educated resistance. Now is not a good time to be reactionary , it is the time to think positively and intelligently so that we can do this and live to see what we have retaken.
You cannot enjoy the freedom if you are dead and I for one would like to tip back a few drinks with you once our job is finished .
Just my opinion and I have the utmost respect for you Mayberry.
R3volution
C4L
Nicely put I too feel like Mayb I think we all do but a time and way to do everything!
ReplyDelete